From the editor: Whilst all the technology around us evolves a break-neck speed, my observations seem to point towards contact centres “getting back to basics” and employee engagement is amongst the list. Quality coaching, genuine staff engagement activities and employing quality leaders are all critical attributes of getting things right in your contact centre in 2017.
A couple of weeks back I published an article about the one role that has the biggest influence on the customer experience – the Team Leader. Not everyone agreed with the sentiment (plenty did though!) and this article follows a similar vein. I’ll let Daniel Ord prosecute the case in his usual entertaining style!
I just wrapped up a certification course in Leadership & Engagement for Team Leaders and as usual, there were some interesting conversations amongst participants.
Despite the prevalence of the topic of engagement, within HR functions and management boardrooms, clarity and appropriate practices around engagement don’t often travel successfully down the line to Team Leaders.
One participant in the course shared this experience about her former Employer, a very large contact centre in Singapore.
Employee engagement was taken seriously.
Employee engagement KPIs had been built into the overall Team Leader ‘basket’ of KPIs and measured things like how many hours of bonding time a Team Leader spent…well…erm…bonding.
“And what about Team Leaders?” she asked.
Aren’t we also supposed to feel engaged at work?
Won’t we be better at helping with staff engagement if we ourselves understand what it’s like to be engaged?
Her question was a fair one – should Team Leaders have KPIs for engagement?
And (in the same vein) shouldn’t Team Leaders themselves be engaged too?
At the heart of the discussion was the role of engagement.
It’s about the types of things that the organisation does, or sets itself up to do, to help employees feel valued and involved.
And based on successful engagement efforts on the part of the organisation – the employee, in turn, would choose to give more ‘discretionary effort’ at work in what is seen as an exchange – or 2-way street.
Employee engagement on the part of the organisation includes things like training, development and career pathing – important in the service world but often absent or given lip service once essential product knowledge & soft skills have been addressed.
And the importance of the line manager in all this is clear – strong effective line management has a proven role in establishing an environment where engagement can flourish.
But very few organisations set up a developmental curriculum for Team Leaders – leaving them to sink (some do), swim (some do) or tread water (many do for many years).
In partial answer to her inquiry on Team Leader KPIs – while line management is a key component in the engagement mix – line managers themselves do not hold all the cards necessary to produce a winning hand.
I’ve always found the best indicator(s) of Team Leader performance to be the productivity (of the Team), the quality (of the Team) and the attitudes (of the Team) that are in play.
If there are challenges with one or more of these aspects, a bit of good old root cause analysis does the trick.
While certification isn’t a necessary mechanism for every learning intervention, it can be a powerful tool with Team Leader development.
If they can’t (and in my experience without solid training they can’t), then it’s a bit tough to ask them to ‘drive’ (what a terrible word) engagement in others.
One of my favourite writers out there is Liz Ryan (follow her on LinkedIn!) – and I share an excerpt from an article she wrote entitled, “What does employee engagement mean?”
“The term employee engagement is still around, and it still makes no sense.
Why do employees have to be engaged with the company mission? They may have their own mission.
They may be working to save money for a house, or to get enough great resume fodder to move to Iceland and start a business there. Thats their passion.
They couldnt care less about the companys mission, and really, why should they? The job is a means to an end for them. Thats okay! Lets be honest paying people to come to work is a means to an end for the company, too.
Some people use the term Employee Engagement more loosely than just the employees engagement with the organisations mission. These folks say if employees are happy and busy, they’re engaged.
I’m okay with that definition. When folks can plug into their own power source at work, they can race forward unimpeded.